A Review of the Behrens–Fisher Problem and Some of its Analogs

Does the Same Size Fit All?

Authors

  • Sudhir Paul University of Windsor
  • You-Gan Wang Queensland University of Technology
  • Insha Ullah Queensland University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v17i4.281

Keywords:

the Behrens–Fisher problem, the beta-binomial model, the negative binomial model, the Weibull model

Abstract

The traditional Behrens–Fisher (B-F) problem is to test the equality of the means µ1 and µ2 of two normal populations using two independent samples, when the quotient of the population variances is unknown. Welch [43] developed a frequentist approximate solution using a fractional number of degrees of freedom t-distribution. We make a a comprehensive review of the existing procedures, propose new procedures, evaluate these for size and power, and make recommendation for the B-F and its analogous problems for non-normal populations. On the other hand, we investigate and answer a question: does the same size fit all all, i.e. is the t-test with Welch’s degree of freedom correction robust enough for the B-F problem analogs, and what sample size is appropriate to use a normal approximation to the Welch statistic.

Published

2019-10-01

How to Cite

Paul , S., Wang , Y.-G., & Ullah , I. (2019). A Review of the Behrens–Fisher Problem and Some of its Analogs: Does the Same Size Fit All?. REVSTAT-Statistical Journal, 17(4), 563–597. https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v17i4.281